2

Let's say you have Group A & Group B, and two contacts, Contact A and Contact B. We want our search to find those contacts who are in both Group A AND Group B.

For example, if Contact A is in Group A only, but Contact B is in both groups, then the result of this search should be 'Contact B'.

Search builder looks like: Contacts, Group(s) = Group A Contacts, Group(s) = Group B

Result: no results.

No errors are logged.

We had several groups built on searches of this type, but after updating from 5.6.1 to 5.10.3 these all broke and began returning no results.

I have tested this on the Demo site but could not reproduce - however the demo site is running 5.13.alpha1, so it's not a fair test.

The release notes for 5.11.0 indicate some search fixes, but not anything that would make me assume this would also be resolved. I wasn't able to find anything in Gitlab about this either. I'd rather not wait for 5.13 to be released so if someone could possibly point me to a specific patch that I could test in the meantime, that would be fantastic.

Improve this question
4
  • Is one group a smart group and the other static?
    – Jon G - Megaphone Tech
    Commented Mar 11, 2019 at 23:09
  • It's an attempt to make a smart group, and all of the referenced groups are also smart groups. I've tried multiple tests, and as soon as you add a second smart group to the criteria it stops returning results. I see now that all the groups on the demo site are manual, I am testing again using smart groups and will post back.
    – freeform.steph
    Commented Mar 12, 2019 at 15:40
  • Confirmed that this works with manual or smart groups on the demo site.
    – freeform.steph
    Commented Mar 12, 2019 at 15:48
  • I would definitely update to the latest released version before putting time into this one.
    – user4278
    Commented Mar 20, 2019 at 2:19

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

There was a bug that got introduced in the 5.10 series which broke these types of searches, i believe there was a patch release maybe 5.10.4 that fixed it but this is the specific fix https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/13667/commits/8966cd19d7897bdadc0588cab2c81df140759efc

Improve this answer
1
  • Thank you! Client decided to wait a bit before testing this but I will come back to confirm when we get to it.
    – freeform.steph
    Commented Apr 9, 2019 at 17:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.